Overview full-color pictureTU Delft logo

Content | Menu | Taal/Language | Banners

U maakt gebruik van een browser die de gebruikte web-standaarden niet of onvolledig ondersteunt.
Hierdoor kunnen afwijkingen in de lay-out ontstaan.

Afhankelijk van uw platform is deze site het beste te bekijken met een recente versie van Microsoft Internet Explorer (5 of hoger), Netscape (6 of hoger), Mozilla (1 of hoger) en Opera (6 of hoger).

Contact |  Search  

European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research (ISSN 1567-7141)

Banners

TU Delft logo
English
Home > Back IssuesVolume 4 Issue 2

A Critical Review of the Standards and Design Processes for Motorway Diverges in the UK

 

G.T. Wall and N.B. Hounsell
School of Civil Engineering and the Environment
University of Southampton
Southampton
U.K
E-mail: grahamw@soton.ac.uk

Full text pdf

 

Abstract

 

This paper contains a critical review of design standards for motorway diverges in the UK over the last 40 years. These standards have been progressively updated at regular intervals and their evolving nature has been assessed. Most changes have been minor as a result of changes to traffic flow, driver behaviour or vehicle performance. A brief comparison has also been made between standards for diverges in the UK and those in other selected EU countries. This paper particularly focuses on the diverging flow-region diagram contained in the latest Government Standard TD22/92 ‘The Layout of Grade-Separated Junctions’. This diagram is used by traffic engineers as a tool in order to select the most appropriate diverge layout for a particular site. The historical background leading to its derivation is reviewed along with a discussion of comments made by five practicing traffic engineers as to its effectiveness and usage. These comments have been used along with other analysis to make recommendations as to how the diagram should be interpreted and how it could be improved.

Keywords: Design standard, Diverge, Diverging flow-region diagram, Layout and Exit


Received: June 2004
Accepted: September 2004

 


This article has appeared on paper in: European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 4, No 2 (2004), pp. 211-229.