Overview full-color pictureTU Delft logo

Content | Menu | Taal/Language | Banners

U maakt gebruik van een browser die de gebruikte web-standaarden niet of onvolledig ondersteunt.
Hierdoor kunnen afwijkingen in de lay-out ontstaan.

Afhankelijk van uw platform is deze site het beste te bekijken met een recente versie van Microsoft Internet Explorer (5 of hoger), Netscape (6 of hoger), Mozilla (1 of hoger) en Opera (6 of hoger).

Contact |  Search  

European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research (ISSN 1567-7141)

Banners

TU Delft logo
English
Home > Back Issues > Volume 14 Issue 2

Handling multiple objectives in optimization of externalities as objectives for dynamic traffic management

 

Luc Wismans*, Eric van Berkum** and Michiel Bliemer***

* Center for Transport Studies, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Team Consulting DAT, P.O. Box 161, 7400AD Deventer Netherlands.
T:+31 570 666 111
E: l.wismans@dat.nl

** Center for Transport Studies, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500AE Enschede, Netherlands.
T:+31 534 894 886
E: e.c.vanberkum@utwente.nl

*** Institute for Transport and Logistics Studies, University of Sydney Business School, St James Campus (C13), NSW 2006, Australia.
T:+61 291 141 940
E: michiel.bliemer@sydney.edu.au

Full text pdf

 

Abstract

Dynamic traffic management (DTM) is acknowledged in various policy documents as an important instrument to improve network performance. This network performance is not only a matter of accessibility, since the externalities of traffic are becoming more and more important objectives as well. Optimization of network performance using DTM measures is a specific example of a network design problem (NDP) and incorporation of externality objectives results in a multi objective network design problem (MO NDP)). Solving this problem resorts in a Pareto optimal set of solutions. A framework is presented with the non-dominated sorting algorithm (NSGAII), the Streamline dynamic traffic assignment model and several externality models, that is used to solve this MO NDP. With a numerical experiment it is shown that the Pareto optimal set provides important information for the decision making process, which would not have been available if the optimization problem was simplified by incorporation of a compensation principle in advance. However, in the end a solution has to be chosen as the best compromise. Since the Pareto optimal set can be difficult to comprehend, ranking it may be necessary to assist the decision makers. Cost benefit analysis which uses the economic compensation principle is a method that is often used for ranking the alternatives. This research shows, that travel time costs are by far the most dominant objective. Therefore other ranking methods should be considered. Differences between these methods are explained and it is illustrated that the outcomes and therefore the eventual decisions taken can be different.

Keywords: multi objective network design problem, transport externalities, dynamic traffic management, cost benefit analysis, multi criteria decision making.